- Ana F. Neves
- Portugal
Legal aid under constitutional scrutiny: a judicial system only for those who can pay and those who are indigent (3/2024)
1. Introduction
On 16 October 2024, the Portuguese Constitutional Court (CC) ruled on the constitutionality of the monthly income threshold above which a person cannot benefit from legal aid (Judgment 727/2024). The CC deemed unconstitutional the provision contained in Articles 8, no. 1, and 8-A of Act 34/2004 of 29 July (on access to law and to courts and transposing into national law Council Directive 2003/8/EC of 27 January 2009 to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes; it has been amended five times) and its Annex (calculation of relevant income for legal protection purposes) that do not allow a legal aid applicant to benefit from exemption of the court fees and other processual costs, including costs associated with the appointment and payment of a lawyer, although the applicant’s monthly income is lower than the national minimum wage. The Court considered that to grant the applicant only the instalment payment violates Article 20(1) of the Constitution, i.e., the right to access law and effective judicial protection, when their available monthly income is substantially equivalent to the value of the initial court fee and when the value of the monthly instalment decreases their respective net income, which is already below the guaranteed minimum monthly wage.
Despite the publicity given to this judgment (“State condemned for charging court fees to those earning below the minimum wage”, Publico, 3 November 2024), this was not the first time that legal aid regulation had been addressed by the Constitutional Court. In fact, this Court has ruled on legal aid several times in recent decades (e.g., Judgment no 364/04, on the legal procedure to decide whether an application should benefit from legal aid). The judgment in reference is the most recent one and illustrates the constitutional approach to the question about what level of economic insufficiency a person must have to benefit from legal aid in terms of being guaranteed effective access to court and a fair trial.
With respect to this judgement, our aim is to present its scope in the context of the Portuguese legal aid system. To this end, it is first briefly described (2.). Second, we report on the terms of the discussion called for by that judgment, which considers the economic insufficiency than a legal aid applicant must have to benefit from it (3.) In conclusion, there is a brief commentary on the regulation and the case law as a whole (4.).