Ana F. Neves - Universidade de Lisboa

1. Introduction

On 16 October 2024, the Portuguese Constitutional Court (CC) ruled on the constitutionality of the monthly income threshold above which a person cannot benefit from legal aid (Judgment 727/2024). The CC deemed unconstitutional the provision contained in Articles 8, no. 1, and 8-A of Act 34/2004 of 29 July (on access to law and to courts and transposing into national law Council Directive 2003/8/EC of 27 January 2009 to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes; it has been amended five times) and its Annex (calculation of relevant income for legal protection purposes) that do not allow a legal aid applicant to benefit from exemption of the court fees and other processual costs, including costs associated with the appointment and payment of a lawyer, although the applicant’s monthly income is lower than the national minimum wage. The Court considered that to grant the applicant only the instalment payment violates Article 20(1) of the Constitution, i.e., the right to access law and effective judicial protection, when their available monthly income is substantially equivalent to the value of the initial court fee and when the value of the monthly instalment decreases their respective net income, which is already below the guaranteed minimum monthly wage.

Despite the publicity given to this judgment (“State condemned for charging court fees to those earning below the minimum wage”, Publico, 3 November 2024), this was not the first time that legal aid regulation had been addressed by the Constitutional Court. In fact, this Court has ruled on legal aid several times in recent decades (e.g., Judgment no 364/04, on the legal procedure to decide whether an application should benefit from legal aid). The judgment in reference is the most recent one and illustrates the constitutional approach to the question about what level of economic insufficiency a person must have to benefit from legal aid in terms of being guaranteed effective access to court and a fair trial.

With respect to this judgement, our aim is to present its scope in the context of the Portuguese legal aid system. To this end, it is first briefly described (2.). Second, we report on the terms of the discussion called for by that judgment, which considers the economic insufficiency than a legal aid applicant must have to benefit from it (3.) In conclusion, there is a brief commentary on the regulation and the case law as a whole (4.).

1. Introduction

The framework of political parties that emerged after the Carnation Revolution in 1974 (which put an end to the authoritarian regime of more than 40 years known as the Estado Novo – e.g., Robert M. Fishman, “What 25 April Was and Why It Mattered”, Portuguese Studies, 2018, 34, no. 1, pp. 20-34, https://doi.org/10.5699/portstudies.34.1.0020.)) has remained relatively stable until today. Essentially, the two largest parties date back to 1975, and no political party has been dissolved since July 2009 (Comissão Nacional de Eleições, 2024; and, e.g., Romano Orrù, “Le ‘legislative’ portoghesi e l’attrattività del governo minoritario nel gioco politico a ‘mosse obbligate’”, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 2/2024, p. 51, doi: 10.17394/113892). However, fourteen of the twenty-four political parties have been constituted since 2009 (idem).

In recent years, the internal life of parties in Portugal has been the cause of significant litigation and media coverage  (e.g., “Constitutional Court again rejects PAN statutes, party will be forced to hold Congress”, 17.04.2024; “Constitutional Court accepts registration of New Right party after three rejections for irregularities”, 09.01.2024; “Left Bloc to rectify amendment to statutes rejected by Constitutional Court”, 14.02.2024). In this context, more attention has been given to intraparty democracy by the public, by middle-level party elites - “traditionally more involved in decision-making and more committed to organisational stability” -, and especially by parties’ general members (Marco Lisi, “Democracia intra-partidária, filiados e elites intermédias: o caso do Partido Socialista português”, Análise Social, 2015, vol. 50, no. 214, pp. 24-25).

There has been significative constitutional case law on political parties in recent years (e.g., Judgements 2/2011, 145/2013, 177/2019, 534/2019, 95/2020, 155/2020, 226/2021, 387/2021, 942/2021 326/2022, 470/2022, 751/2022, 844/2022 374/2023, 504/2023, 542/2022 699/2023, 864/2023, 929/2023, and 126/2024). The main issues include the approval and amendment of parties’ statutes, the election procedure of holders of office in political parties, compliance with party statutes of elective acts and other decisions, namely, the application of disciplinary sanctions to militants (e.g., for publicly expressing disagreement with the party's positions or the party's lists of candidates for a given election) and the control of accounts submitted by political parties.

The number of cases and the subjects they address raise the question of what they reflect about the Portuguese political and party system and how they relate to the decline of democracy and the rule of law. In the present work, the objective is to present such case law and put it in the context of the deficits of democracy in Portugal. First, the fundamental legal framework of political parties is described. The Constitutional Court's sphere of competence with respect to political parties is then summarised. After, the main questions on which the Constitutional Court has focused are explained (with the exception of political parties’ accounts, which are worthy of a specific analysis - Beatriz Rebelo Garcia, “The Control of Political Parties' Accounts by the Portuguese Constitutional Court”, September 3, 2022, Lisbon Public Law Working Paper No. 2023-4, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4498940)). Finally, some of the related problems of Portuguese democracy are mentioned, bearing in mind the international assessment of its deterioration.

1. Introduction

On 23 January 2024, the Portuguese Constitutional Court (in Plenary and in an abstract constitutionality review process) changed its case law regarding the criminalisation of mistreatment of companion animals (Ruling no. 70/2024). Previously, since 2021, the Court has considered in several concrete constitutionality review processes that under the Portuguese Constitution, there is no legitimacy, protected value or legal interest for such incrimination and that its legal features do not comply with the nullum crimen sine lege certa precept.

In Ruling 70/2024, the majority of the Court considered that the protection of animal welfare is part of the Constitution in a material sense. Regarding lex certa, the Constitutional Court ruled - with the casting vote of the President - that the enunciation of the elements describing the penalised conduct and its object does not allow to affirm the indeterminability of the norm that typifies the crime of mistreatment of a companion animal.

The rulings were pronounced by a divided court, with divergent conceptions about Criminal Law, its relationship with the Constitution, and its interpretation of the Constitution

To understand the controversy and the Constitutionality judgment shift, first, the criminalisation of animal mistreatment in the Portuguese legal system is presented and put into context, as well as the previous constitutional case law on the matter. Second, the legal arguments supporting the 2024 ruling and the dissenting votes are described. Finally, the Court precomprehensions that the case law reveals and its relevance are highlighted.

In Portugal, there is a high housing vacancy rate and a high housing shortage, particularly of affordable housing (e.g., Eurostat, Housing price statistics - house price index, 5 July 2023; and The 2023 edition of our Expat Insider survey).

This is explained by the “increased private investment and exports of services associated with tourism”, which “has produced contradictory effects”: it “has allowed the recovery of economic activity” and the “requalification of urban centres”; but there has also been “a very significant rise in housing prices and rents, first in areas with greater tourism pressure and later spreading to peripheral territories”, forcing many families to move house or increase their housing effort rate (explanatory memorandum of the Draft Law 71/XV/1, of 14 April 2023, that establishes measures to ensure more housing). This act was voted and adopted on its general principles and on the details (Article 168 of the Constitution) by the Parliament (Assembly of the Republic) on 6 July 2023. It has to be enacted as law by the President of the Republic (Article 136 of the Constitution).

This is the most recent and controversial legislative intervention regarding housing. There have been several participations during the public consultation period, several opinions were included in the legislative procedure and numerous proposals to modify the initial Government proposal were presented by the political Parties in Parliament.

Pagina 1 di 4

Osservatorio sulle fonti

Rivista telematica registrata presso il Tribunale di Firenze (decreto n. 5626 del 24 dicembre 2007). ISSN 2038-5633.

L’Osservatorio sulle fonti è stato riconosciuto dall’ANVUR come rivista scientifica e collocato in Classe A.

Contatti

Per qualunque domanda o informazione, puoi utilizzare il nostro form di contatto, oppure scrivici a uno di questi indirizzi email:

Direzione scientifica: direzione@osservatoriosullefonti.it
Redazione: redazione@osservatoriosullefonti.it

Il nostro staff ti risponderà quanto prima.

© 2017 Osservatoriosullefonti.it. Registrazione presso il Tribunale di Firenze n. 5626 del 24 dicembre 2007 - ISSN 2038-5633